When you think about franchises like Godzilla, it comes with certain expectations. Though there were many ways to approach a new Godzilla film, this film decided to take an approach that leads to something closer to reality than has ever been seen in previous movies. I don’t claim to be an expert on what it means to create a Godzilla film. I haven’t seen very many of the movies in the series. But what I do know, is that this film succeeds at creating an engrossing world.
This version of “Godzilla” avoids any attempt to modernize it to fit within the current action movie framework. It could have been an incoherent mess caused by quick cuts and editing. Thankfully, the movie is easy to follow and yet artfully executed. It felt many times as if I was watching “Jurassic Park” for the first time. The film has that classic approach that allows for the major focus of the film to occasionally be presented in the background while still keeping the focus on it.
Alexandre Desplat wrote a fantastic dark orchestral soundtrack for “Godzilla” that blends together elements of Ligeti’s Requiem and Japanese instruments to create a musical palate that fits the film perfectly. Desplat’s Godzilla theme has the perfect amount of majestic flair to fit the great monster while the action music matches the frantic emergency facing so many people during moments of ultimate destruction.
Though there have been many complaints about certain characters failing to capture attention as much as they should, I found all of the characters to fit well within the story as presented. Though Aaron Taylor-Johnson isn’t the most capable actor for the role here, he didn’t seem to me to miss the mark significantly at any time. Through the combination of long shots for the action and larger-than-life spectacle presented masterfully, “Godzilla” succeeds at bringing the classic franchise to a new generation of viewers. This is one film you will have a hard time looking away from.
Going into this film I saw a lot of negative reviews and I am glad to say that I disagree with them completely. If you enjoyed the first film, you will be excited to see more of Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker. There are certainly a few areas where the film fails to achieve perfection but I generally enjoyed it and think it was a solid entry in the series.
As is expected with a Spider-man movie, a good amount of time is spent with Peter Parker’s exploration of what life means and how he is going to juggle his relationships with being Spiderman. I thought those sections were generally well-done and gave added insight into his character. We also get to learn some more about what happened to Peter’s dad, helping round out the story.
I thought the general setup for the character of Electro was well-done. There was plenty of motivation for him to go on a rampage and the fights were solid. I also enjoyed the short fights we got to see with both Rhino and The Green Goblin. Sadly, neither of the fights were particularly lengthy and seemed like a bit of a wasted chance. The Green Goblin was one of the best versions of the villain I’ve seen on screen but he is too quickly defeated.
Musically, Hans Zimmer provides a highly functional approach with a lot of different musical ideas mixed together. Spider-man’s new theme is quite heroic and fits the character perfectly. The theme gets plenty of play at key parts of the film, enhancing the power. Max, who later turns into Electro, gets an interesting theme as well. That theme is later developed nicely into the Electro theme by adding dubstep and some whispering rap vocals. Each of these themes is nicely developed in a few different presentations, tying everything together. I was surprised to hear such a traditional approach to the score from Zimmer and even more surprised at how well it worked.
Overall, “The Amazing Spider-man 2” is a satisfying entry in the new series. The film manages to bring in plenty of emotion throughout, keeping things focused on the characters, where they belong. If you enjoyed Andrew Garfield in the previous entry, there is plenty to enjoy here as well.
I went into “Captain America The Winter Soldier” with high expectations. The critics seemed to be generally in agreement that it was well made. In the end I was rather disappointed. It was better than the first film in some ways and worse in others. The first film seemed to have a more interesting plot but lost out in the action by making Captain America too human. This one seems to have tossed out the interesting plot in favor of solid action.
Now Captain America is shown as more of a superhero than before, coming across as something a bit better than the average soldier of before. Sadly, though this makes the film more exciting, it doesn’t really make sense considering the antics he goes through. The action is mostly a combination of Bourne style hand-to-hand and modern FBI style of shoot outs. Some of the action is quite well-done so if you are able to ignore some of the plot issues you might enjoy the action.
After a fairly solid opening, the film seemed to loose steam and lost me with what makes The Winter Soldier a particularly strong threat. Though it succeeds in delivering engaging action, it feels ultimately pointless plot wise in the end. It also makes little sense that Captain America is not joined by any of his buddies now that the film takes place after the events of “The Avengers.” If the threats were so great that Director Fury was in harm’s way, why leave it all up to Captain America?
Jackman’s score largely blends with the picture in a style that would fit a Greengrass film and fails to impress thematically. Much of the music is driven by drum loops that overpower the orchestra. The film-makers decided to rely on Silvestri’s earlier work for the themes used at times but it is used sparingly just as the original film.
Overall, “Captain America The Winter Soldier” might satisfy those looking for brainless action but anyone wanting more will be disappointed in how the plot resolves. Compared to the story delivery in Agents of Shield, this should have been a lot better.
Biblical movies have a bit of a high bar to live up to thanks to some powerful cinematic achievements during the 50s and 60s. Despite some high expectations from the director and cast, Noah doesn’t live up to expectations. It has some engaging visuals but doesn’t reach the same heights as other similar films.
Noah opens with a creation story and takes its sweet time to get to the juicy part. While in some films this would be much needed character development, it felt to me like it was dragging its feet. As things finally get to the building of the arc and what happens after, it still feels unnecessarily fleshed out. The film spends too much time on minor characters who shouldn’t be given much development at all.
There is also the problematic story element of the fallen angels in the movie. Though they bear striking similarities to the living trees in Lord of the Rings, it was a bit surprising to see them helping Noah build the arc and fighting off other men who tried to board the giant vessel. Though it is hard to believe that Noah and his family would have been able to build such a giant boat without assistance, I found they removed all sense of realism from the story. It makes me wonder why nothing of them was shown in the trailers.
Musically, Clint Mansell provides a largely droning atmospheric score for the film that is heavy on simplistic motifs. The music largely feels cheap with the film because of a lot of synthesizer effects applied. The music takes on a strange ephemeral character that only furthers the lack of realism in the movie. While it did enhance the dark feel of the movie, it might have been more effective if the music was more traditional.
I wouldn’t be particularly bothered by some of the variations from the traditional story if they had resulted in an engaging film. Most of the movie left me feeling like the characters weren’t particularly sincere in their belief. The darker side of some of the characters, though in line with the recent trend in film-making, felt forced and didn’t really make the characters any more interesting.
When I first saw the trailers for Rush I was not expecting it to be very good. It looked like the movie was all about two idiots who managed to act like children while racing against one another. Thankfully, something about the trailer made me want to watch the movie so I later rented it when it showed up on Netflix.
Rush is an exhilarating film that explores the various things that drive us as people. By exploring the characters of two different racers at the same time, we get to see what racing was like for two totally different personalities. James Hunt (Chris Hemsworth) gives us an idea what a hot headed playboy in racing is like. Niki Lauda (Daniel Bruhl) gives us a taste of what a more calculated approach brings to the same sport.
Early on the film tells us that the focus will be on the rivalry between Lauda and Hunt. Though I have never watched Formula 1 before, I found the rivalry to be quite engaging. It gives deeper meaning to the film as races come and go. I would have liked to have seen more of some of the races, especially because of the exotic locations where they were set. Still, I recognize that budgetary concerns and the realities of recreating some of these races make that difficult.
Hans Zimmer wrote a magnificent main theme for the film that captures perfectly the spirit of competition at its core. At times the music is primarily instrumental rock but once the orchestra comes in with the main theme, it feels as powerful as it should. I had heard some samples of the music prior to seeing the film and wrote off Zimmer’s score as boring rock. Thankfully, it proved to be much more than that.
In a world where many films feel shallow and lacking in meaning, Rush races ahead with plenty of energy and enthusiasm. Recognizing the true story behind the film makes it even more exciting. I can only imagine what it must have been like to follow this glorious rivalry as it was unfolding in real time on the Formula 1 Circuit. Thankfully, “Rush” manages to deliver plenty of thrills of its own.
In “Philomena,” Judi Dench gives a lovely performance that helps make it one of the most touching films I’ve seen recently. I’d heard about it from a few people while it was in theaters but never got around to watching the trailer. Now I wish I had gone to see it in theaters. Thankfully it was available on a plane flight between Tokyo and incheon airport. It was a great way to get through a flight.
I found the story to be quite engaging and well presented. It is hard to review this film without spoiling some of the major details. There will be some spoilers here contrary to my typical style of reviews. I’ve was raised in the Catholic Church so many of the themes really resonated with me. The shaming of young girls who have sex and the church teaching on sex in general has troubled me for some time.
Growing up as a young bisexual man in the Catholic Church I faced some issues with these same teachings when I realized the church wouldn’t ever recognize a relationship I had with another man. Since marrying my husband I left the church. I find the teachings on sex to be a way of dealing with a subject that otherwise can’t be explained to the satisfaction of young people. It is easier to tell them that God wants them to deny themselves than to actually address sex for what it is.
As we see in the film, many young girls are inadequately prepared for meeting men and give in to the desires to have sex. Because birth control is described as a sin these women ultimately have babies but for a time were shamed by their families when this happened. Understandably the church wanted those children to be sent away and in Ireland many of them were sold to the United States.
Although it isn’t addressed as a problem with church teachings there are also some gay themes addressed in the film. Philomena’s missing Son turns out to have been gay and died of aids. This brings to light issues of gay shaming through his involvement in the Republican party and how he had to pretend to be straight to succeed.
In some ways this could be seen as a theme of the power of the truth. The reporter character is an example of ways the truth is not so useful because of how his negativity tends to bring others down. My husband would suggest that I have a similar way about me but I prefer to call myself uncensored.
The same things I enjoyed about the film got others complaining that the film is another example of liberals trying to present a story that would validate the pro birth control approach. I find the multiple viewpoints presented give the viewer plenty of choice to agree with the nuns and condemn the young women for their sexual choices or to agree with the reporter and mock the Church’s teachings.
Musically, Alexandre Desplat provides a delightfully tender thematic score with a number of old-style themes. The music largely stays in the background but when it becomes noticeable I slowly fell in love with the theme for Philomena. This, along with The Monuments Men, give Alexandre Desplat a good chance of being known for some of the best scores of recent memory.
If you like to see difficult subjects explored through a character study, Philomena is a worthwhile watch. It will be especially interesting for anyone who was raised in a religious household and knows all of the strict rules explored quite well.
“300” ended at the perfect time for a sequel to come through with even bigger battles. Eva Green steals the show with her enthralling performance as Artemisia, the commander of Xerxes’ navy. She gets plenty of screen time and fights like a fiend. Sullivan Stapleton gives a solid performance as Themistocles, the leader of the Greek army. His clashes with Artemisia are quite fun. Fighting wise, things are pretty much the same, with the exception of the new naval battles. I found many of the bigger naval battles to be more interesting because we actually get to see strategy behind them rather than just a bunch of hand-to-hand combat.
There is plenty of time for multiple battles because “300 Rise of an Empire” doesn’t have to spend too much time on back-story. Sadly, Lena Headey still has a relatively minor part here, and we will probably have to wait for the inevitable third film to see her shine. While it is slightly disappointing that we don’t get to see full resolution in this new film, I am glad that the studio is taking enough time to flesh out all the different battles as much as they should be.
Musically, this film falls far behind the first. While Tyler Bates didn’t write the best or most original music for “300” at least his music elevated the film beyond what was on screen. Newcomer Junkie XL wrote a largely cheap sounding generic score heavy on percussion and middle-eastern vocals that lacks any central themes to keep it together. While it fits fine with what is on screen, a more accomplished composer would have been able to raise the film a bit higher. Most action is accompanied by repetitive drums. The orchestra sounds so bad that it might as well have been synthesized.
Like “300” before it, “300 Rise of an Empire” is a solid popcorn flick that delivers plenty of spectacle and demands to be seen on the big screen. I didn’t see it in 3D and I don’t recommend it because it was converted in post-production. If you enjoyed the power and blood of the first film, you will find a lot to love in this bigger sequel.
This week was the perfect example of why I am not going to give up reviewing movies anytime soon. I like to think of myself as the anti-critic, sometimes appreciating something the critics hate and hating on something the critics love. I still can’t figure out what led to so many positive reviews of “The Lego Movie.” Today I am now left wondering why so many critics didn’t give “The Monuments Men” positive ratings. As a sign of the times it seems even most critics don’t appreciate the older style of film-making and scoring. It is no surprise that “The Monuments Men” will probably be the only film I watch this year where the music is so deliciously thematic.
Unlike all of those war films focusing on battles, “The Monuments Men” focuses on the attempts of a few art experts to save major artwork from being destroyed during World War 2. I can understand some of the disappointment considering the film doesn’t have the same tone as we saw in the early trailers. Rather than some lighthearted comedy, this is mostly a serious film, but rightfully so. Admittedly, it does move along at a slower pace than we have gotten used to lately but it never drags or feels in need of serious editing. This older style of filming is a homage to earlier war films with ensemble casts, and it gives composer Alexandre Desplat a chance to write perhaps his greatest score to date.
The music is reminiscent of scores like John Addison’s “A Bridge Too Far” and Elmer Bernstein’s “The Great Escape.” It has a jaunty main theme and a number of sub-themes that show up at times. The main theme re-appears in a number of different forms, including some somber sections, and some more heroic ones. The music is thankfully given a chance to shine like we rarely see these days. Most sequences are devoid of sound effects as the music carries the scenes. While some found this to be distracting, I found it quite engaging and endearing to the film.
I can tell from George Clooney’s performance in the film that he deliberately choose to take a more reverent tone to the film. I was quite glad he did, because it helped focus on the seriousness of the story behind it all. This film might be too slow for some, and the music might be too manipulative for others. But if you appreciate the classic style of film-making and the thematic style of film scoring, this is a gorgeous film that will re-kindle the joy you felt when you first heard some of the great film scores of the past fifty years.
After all the positive reviews I was ready to write a review similar to the one I read on Badass Digest, titled “I Really Wanted to Hate the Lego Movie.” The article explains all the reasons the author thought it was going to be stupid and he fell in love with it. Sadly, I can’t say the same thing. I was expecting the movie to be completely stupid and it largely was, but was still funny and witty enough at times that I don’t feel like I completely wasted my money. I haven’t really seen enough from this new wave of comedies to know if this is some separate style of comedy that I just don’t connect with. I do have a problem when the only reason I am laughing at something on screen is because the character is acting like an idiot.
The plot as generic as they come. Take every movie about an unexpected hero who saves the world and you have the plot of “The Lego Movie” minus the interesting twist at the end. What makes it unbearable is the painful dialog. I get that the movie is trying to parody this sort of film but rather than laughing at how witty the whole thing was, I just shook my head and felt embarrassed that I actually fell for the reviews praising this thing. Until I read the reviews I was ready to write this off as a pointless stupid film that was as dumb as the trailers, which made me shake my head. If you thought everything was awesome in the trailers from the start you might fall in love with this like everyone else.
Musically, I was expecting a lot more than the end result. I won’t blame Mark Mothersbaugh too much because the film he scored totally called for the throwaway score we get. Then again, if I actually thought the song “Everything is Awesome” was catchy, like every other review I’ve read, I might giggle at its re-appearance here and there in the music. To me that song was just as disgustingly trashy as the style of music it is trying to imitate. Mothersbaugh uses some different musical styles to fit the different worlds we get to see but mostly it sounds cheap, with any orchestra that he used barely getting heard among his cutsey synthesizers. I was hoping that this half-assed hero would get a nice heroic theme but it seems writing a score that sounds like it would fit the serious version of the film being parodied isn’t in style anymore.
Despite expecting this to be a total waste of time, I did get a few chuckles here and there. I also quite enjoyed seeing the Lego bricks come alive in 3D. There is something strangely intriguing about seeing Lego flames and Lego water throughout. I also thought the twist in the last act was quite brilliant. It almost redeemed everything that came before it. Sadly, this is still pretty much a children’s movie with a few little gags thrown in there for the adults, like “Wreck it Ralph” before it. As much as the critics like to give props for a few gems hidden in a kid’s movie, it seems their bar is a bit low for even this material. It might be miles ahead of a lot of the trash that passes for animated films these days but it isn’t going to be remembered as some stroke of genius.
Though slightly different than a film, I feel that certain Anime series are deserving of a review as a whole. Single series shows especially are great for this. “Majestic Prince” is a recent mecha Anime that has some interesting ideas and some solid action but otherwise failed to reach the higher marks that it set for itself.
In typical Anime fashion, the story focuses on a group of five friends from the same school who get recruited to join in the fight to defend humans from alien invaders. It turns out that these five kids were specifically raised for compatibility with a new kind of mecha suits that connects with the pilot’s DNA. At first I was wondering if these five would ever learn to work together. Though they grow closer throughout the show, they never truly gain the proper bonds I would hope to see.
Other problems I had with the show were many. For one, it seems that the commanding officers of the Human armies are ridiculously incompetent. We watch helplessly as their underlings warn them of the problems with their strategies only to see them arrogantly ignore the warnings and go ahead with the mission.
I also had a big problem with the believability of the scenarios in general. The large battles seem poorly set up and we are led to believe that the Human military commanders are unable to do much more than react to this new enemy. The big reveals we get later that attempt to explain the setup of the show largely fall flat. The final episode ends abruptly with very little explanation given as far as how things went after the resolution of the final conflict.
I found the soundtrack a bit disappointing as well, especially considering what Toshiyuki Watanabe has written for other recent Anime, especially Space Brothers. I could guess why he decided to write the big choral work for the invaders, given their similarities to medieval royalty, however I found the majority of the music to be lacking in anything that stood out. The battle music never really presented any memorable themes that stuck with me when I finished watching.
Despite all these problems, the characters were fairly well developed and moderately interesting. You should expect that most of these characters are going to be typical Anime stereotypes but I did find they grew on me as the season progressed. Despite my initial problems with the character designs, they turned out better than I expected once things got going.
I also found the action sequences to be impressively animated. There were a number of times during the one-on-one mech battles where I noticed some pretty spectacular animation. Sadly, this didn’t hold true to some of the bigger battles where it turned into a bunch of generic lasers firing from each side. The different ways the mechs reacted to difficult fights and found extra stores of energy were well done even if the general concept is typical for this sort of Anime.
Overall, if you are a fan of mecha Anime and are interested in checking this one out, I think it is worth your time, although don’t expect it to be without its faults. If you are able to overlook some pretty annoying oversights in the plot and enjoy the big fights for what they are, you might find something fun here.